Leadership Styles: Command and Control vs. Servant Leadership

1 Minute Read

Leadership manifests in Command and Control (C&C) and Servant Leadership. Each approach offers unique advantages and implications for organizational success.

At a Glance

Command and Control Leadership:

Traditional and hierarchical.

Emphasizes top-down decision-making.

Provides clarity, efficiency, consistency, and accountability.

Command and Control are generally used in a crisis or emergency.

Servant Leadership:

Prioritizes serving and empowering team members.

Fosters collaboration, innovation, and long-term success.

Promotes open communication and employee engagement.

Improved collaboration, lower employee turnover, and sustainable company growth.

Comparison

Decision-Making:

C&C: Top-down decision-making - authoritative, as opposed to a participative style.

Servant Leadership: Collaborative decision-making through direct or indirect influence.

Communication:

C&C: Hierarchical communication.

Servant Leadership: Open and transparent communication.

Motivation:

C&C: Fear-based motivation.

Servant Leadership: Intrinsic motivation through a shared vision.

Feedback: Servant leaders tend to welcome input and well-placed criticism. In a command and control environment, feedback usually flows from leader to subordinate.

Looking Ahead

Businesses must be agile, innovative, and forward-thinking. Team members must be encouraged to be candid and even have thoughtful disagreements.

However, servant leadership shouldn't be confused with insubordination or disrespect, as some may fear. 

The Takeaway

In the evolving landscape of today's workplaces, a flexible and adaptive leadership style is often the most successful.

We need to let valuable ideas surface.

Thanks for reading, - MA

I'm happy to connect on Linkedin if you're a P&L executive, business discipline leader, or media professional.